The Great Divergence
Long-run GDP reconstructions show that today's North–South income gaps largely widen in the 19th–20th centuries, not “since forever.” The divergence is consistent with industrialization + imperial integration being central to the story. This playground lets you encode hypotheses about which accelerants mattered, when, and how much.
Aggregation Models
Three aggregation functions transform accelerant values into a composite score:
Additive: f=i∑wi⋅xi Multiplicative: f=i∏xiwi(Cobb–Douglas) CES: f=(i∑wi⋅xiρ)1/ρ The CES (constant elasticity of substitution) nests the other two: as ρ→0 it approximates the geometric mean, and at ρ=1 it reduces to the additive form. Negative ρ makes accelerants complements (weakest-link behavior).
Shapley Attribution
The Shapley value from cooperative game theory provides a principled way to allocate “credit” among interacting factors:
ϕi=n!1π∈Π∑[v(Siπ∪{i})−v(Siπ)] For each ordering of accelerants, we measure how much adding accelerant i changes the gap. Averaging over all orderings gives a fair split that accounts for interactions. We approximate this with Monte Carlo sampling over permutations.
Accelerants
- Energy: scalable energy (coal, oil, electrification) — Pomeranz's coal + New World framing.
- Institutions: property rights, credible commitment, contract enforcement — Acemoglu, Johnson & Robinson.
- State capacity: tax, administration, infrastructure, public goods.
- Human capital: education, literacy, health, technology absorption.
- Innovation: scientific ecosystems, diffusion, R&D — Mokyr's “culture of growth.”
- Finance: intermediation depth, risk-sharing, cost of capital.
- Trade: terms-of-trade, bargaining power, value-chain control.
- Empire: coerced labor, colonial extraction, unequal exchange — Beckert's “war capitalism.”
- Geography: endowments, waterways, disease burdens, transport costs.
Caveats
- All values are illustrative placeholders, not authoritative historical data. Replace with your own estimates.
- Attribution is model-conditioned: changing the aggregator changes the credit split.
- Factors are endogenous and interactive — there is no model-free, uniquely correct “credit split.”
- The gap between North and South is not explained by any single accelerant; the interaction structure matters.