north-south divergence

accelerants, aggregation models, and Shapley attribution across historical time bins
selected: Industrial takeoff1750 CE–1850 CEgap: 0.2719
gap over time (f(N)−f(S))
bin profile: Global North vs Global South
Shapley attribution (Monte Carlo)
Positive bars increase the N\u2013S gap under the current model.

The Great Divergence

Long-run GDP reconstructions show that today's North–South income gaps largely widen in the 19th–20th centuries, not “since forever.” The divergence is consistent with industrialization + imperial integration being central to the story. This playground lets you encode hypotheses about which accelerants mattered, when, and how much.

Aggregation Models

Three aggregation functions transform accelerant values into a composite score:

Additive: f=iwixi\text{Additive: } f = \sum_i w_i \cdot x_i
Multiplicative: f=ixiwi(Cobb–Douglas)\text{Multiplicative: } f = \prod_i x_i^{w_i} \quad \text{(Cobb\text{--}Douglas)}
CES: f=(iwixiρ)1/ρ\text{CES: } f = \left(\sum_i w_i \cdot x_i^\rho\right)^{1/\rho}

The CES (constant elasticity of substitution) nests the other two: as ρ0\rho \to 0 it approximates the geometric mean, and at ρ=1\rho = 1 it reduces to the additive form. Negative ρ\rho makes accelerants complements (weakest-link behavior).

Shapley Attribution

The Shapley value from cooperative game theory provides a principled way to allocate “credit” among interacting factors:

ϕi=1n!πΠ[v(Siπ{i})v(Siπ)]\phi_i = \frac{1}{n!}\sum_{\pi \in \Pi} \left[v(S_i^\pi \cup \{i\}) - v(S_i^\pi)\right]

For each ordering of accelerants, we measure how much adding accelerant ii changes the gap. Averaging over all orderings gives a fair split that accounts for interactions. We approximate this with Monte Carlo sampling over permutations.

Accelerants

  • Energy: scalable energy (coal, oil, electrification) — Pomeranz's coal + New World framing.
  • Institutions: property rights, credible commitment, contract enforcement — Acemoglu, Johnson & Robinson.
  • State capacity: tax, administration, infrastructure, public goods.
  • Human capital: education, literacy, health, technology absorption.
  • Innovation: scientific ecosystems, diffusion, R&D — Mokyr's “culture of growth.”
  • Finance: intermediation depth, risk-sharing, cost of capital.
  • Trade: terms-of-trade, bargaining power, value-chain control.
  • Empire: coerced labor, colonial extraction, unequal exchange — Beckert's “war capitalism.”
  • Geography: endowments, waterways, disease burdens, transport costs.

Caveats

  • All values are illustrative placeholders, not authoritative historical data. Replace with your own estimates.
  • Attribution is model-conditioned: changing the aggregator changes the credit split.
  • Factors are endogenous and interactive — there is no model-free, uniquely correct “credit split.”
  • The gap between North and South is not explained by any single accelerant; the interaction structure matters.